As far back as the second
century, Galen noted that a heart, removed from the body and its nerves,
continued to beat. The answer to what triggered the heartbeat was the subject
of debate, with successive anatomical pieces being assembled to help solve this
puzzle, until the first decade of the twentieth century.
The first pieces were laid
down in 1839 by Jan Purkinje, a Bohemian physiologist-anatomist, who spoke
thirteen languages, was a poet, and translated the poetry of Goethe and
Schiller. Among his many significant discoveries was a series of fibers—the
Purkinje fibers—in the ventricles (lower chamber) of the heart, but he failed
to recognize their function. Working at Cambridge University in the 1880s,
Walter Gaskell studied the formation of heart impulses and conduction of a
heartbeat proceeding as a wave from the atria (upper chambers) to the
ventricles. He noted that after surgically separating the atrial and
ventricular chambers, the ventricles ceased to beat. In 1893, the Swiss-born
cardiologist-anatomist Wilhelm His, Jr., described a bridge connecting the
upper and lower chambers, but not the function of this muscle branch (“bundle
of His”).
The year 1868 marked the end
of the shogunate and the start of Japan’s path from feudal state to modernized
nation. Japan opened its doors to Western culture, adopting a German system of
education. Sunao Tawara, a Japanese medical graduate sent to Germany in 1903,
studied the conduction system of the heart and discovered the atrioventricular
(AV) conducting system and AV node. He recognized that electrical impulses
traveled from the bundle of His to the Purkinje fibers, which were part of an
electrical conducting system. The final puzzle piece was laid in place in 1907
when the Scottish anthropologist-anatomist Arthur Keith and the medical student
Martin Flack microscopically discovered the sino-atrial (SA) node—the
“pacemaker”—the site at which the impulse driving the heartbeat originated, and
its conduction from the AV node through the ventricles. Keith gained notoriety,
however, as a racist and collaborator in the Piltdown Man hoax.
No comments:
Post a Comment