BIOLOGICAL SCALING
The
smallest microbe and the largest mammal have something in common. Based on
their relative body size, they have the same rates of metabolism. Similarly, a
frog’s legs grow in direct size proportion to its body. This simple
relationship does not always follow, as small changes in the body size of the
Hercules beetle lead to a disproportionately large increase in the dimensions
of its legs and antennae. Interest in comparing the relationship between one
body part or biological function to the size of the entire body can be traced
back to about 1900 when the French physiologist Louis Lapicque compared the
brain size in a number of animal species to their body size.
In
1924, the English evolutionary biologist Julian Huxley measured the relative
growth rates of the large claw of the fiddler crab (Uca pugnax) to its body
size at different stages of development, and noted that the claw size was
growing at a proportionately greater rate. He developed a mathematical formula
to describe this relationship and continued to study biological scaling over
the next dozen years. To avoid confusion and bring a state of coherency and
mathematical consistency to these studies, in 1936, Huxley and Georges Tessier,
who was independently working in this area, published joint papers—one in English,
the other in French—in the premier journals in their respective languages. In
these papers, they introduced a new neutral term—allometry (“different
measure”)—to refer to changes in the relative size of one body part to the
overall body size.
Unlike some animals, a frog’s legs grow in direct size proportion to its body. This illustration of different species of frogs comes from Ernst Haeckel’s Art Forms of Nature (1904). |
The
term allometry has been expanded to now include such relationships as
body size and basal metabolic rate (BMR), the metabolic rate of a resting
organism. In 1932, the Swiss biologist Max Kleiber
determined that elephants had lower absolute BMRs and heart rates than mice
but, when their body mass was considered, the BMR was a constant ¾ power of
body mass. Using Kleiber’s law, this same BMR relationship was subsequently
shown to exist from tiny microbes to elephants, suggesting a common
evolutionary link.
No comments:
Post a Comment