The most
widely accepted hypothesis, explaining phloem transport is called pressure flow
mechanism, first proposed by Munch in 1927. Two regions can be recognized in
the plants, source and sink.
Sugar is
actively loaded into the sieve tube element at the source. As a result of
differences in water potential, water moves osmotically into the sieve tube
element. At the sink sugar is actively unloaded and water leaves the sieve tube
element by osmosis. The gradient of sugar from source to sink causes pressure
flow through the sieve tube toward the sink.
An area
where sugar is made is called source e.g. green leaves and stem. Any area where
sugar is stored or used is called sink e.g. young leaves, fruits, seeds and
roots. According to pressure flow mechanism water containing sugar in solution
flows under pressure through the phloem. It involves the following.
a) Glucose
is produced by photosynthesis in the mesophyll cells of the green leaves. Some
glucose is used within the cells during respiration. The rest of glucose is
converted into non-reducing sugar i.e. sucrose.
b) It
has been shown that the sucrose concentration in sieve tubes in leaves is
commonly between 10 to 30 percent whereas it forms only 0.5% solution in the
photosynthesis cells.
c) The
sucrose is actively transported to the companion cells of the smallest vein in
a leaf.
d) The
sucrose diffuses through the plasmodesmata to sieve tube elements. As a result,
concentration of sucrose increases in the sieve tube cells or elements. The
sucrose is actively transported to the sieve elements.
e) Water
moves by osmosis from the nearby xylem in the leaf vein. This increases the
hydrostatic pressure of the sieve tube elements.
f) Hydrostatic
pressure moves the sucrose and other substances in the sieve tube cells, and
then moves to sink. In the storage sinks, such as sugar beet root and sugar
cane stem, sucrose is removed into apoplast prior to entering symplast of the
sink.
g) Water
moves out of sieve tube cells by osmosis, lowering hydrostatic pressure. Thus
the pressure gradient is established as a consequence of entry of sugars in
sieve elements at the source and removal of sugar i.e. sucrose at the sink.
h) The
presence of sieve plates greatly increases the resistance along the pathway and
results in the generation and maintenance of substantial pressure gradient in
the sieve elements between source and sink.
The
sieve elements contents are physically pushed along the transportation pathway
by bulk flow. The pressure flow theory accounts for the mass flow of molecules
within phloem. As the sap is pushed down the phloem sugar is removed by the
cortex of both stem and root and is consumed or converted into starch. Starch
is insoluble and exerts no osmotic effect. Consequently the osmotic pressure of
the contents of phloem decreases. Finally relatively pure water is left in the
phloem and this is thought to leave by osmosis or be drawn back into nearby xylem
vessels by suction of the transpiration pull.
The
pressure flow mechanism depends upon: 1) Turgor pressure 2) Difference of
osmotic pressure gradient along the direction of flow between the source and
the sink.
The
objection leveled against the pressure flow mechanism is that it does not
explain the phenomenon of bidirectional movement i.e. movement of different
substances in opponent directions at the same time. The phenomenon of
bidirectional movement can be demonstrated by applying two different substances
at the same time to two different points of phloem of a stem and following
their longitudinal movement along the stem. The bidirectional movement occurs
in a single sieve tube or not. If the mechanism of translocation operates
according to pressure flow hypothesis, bidirectional movement in a single sieve
tube is not possible. Experiments to demonstrate bidirectional movement in a
single sieve tube are technically very difficult to perform. Some experiments
indicate that bidirectional movement may occur in a single sieve tube, whereas
others do not.
Very helpful and well explained!
ReplyDeleteThere is a typo in "f". "Sugar beef".
Thanks for pointing that out. The typo has been corrected and please mention any mistakes you may find in other posts on this blog.
Delete