Singapore – June 1, 2025 — For the first
time, the Indian military has publicly acknowledged the loss of fighter jets
during a brief but intense military confrontation with Pakistan in May. The
revelation was made by India’s Chief of Defense Staff, General Anil
Chauhan, during an interview with Bloomberg TV on the sidelines of
the Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore.
While General Chauhan did not disclose
the exact number of aircraft lost, he attributed the setbacks to
"technical errors" and emphasized that the four-day conflict never
escalated to the brink of nuclear war. He confirmed that communication lines
with Pakistan remained open throughout the standoff, a move he said helped
prevent further escalation.
Chauhan declined to
comment on U.S. President Donald Trump’s earlier assertion that American
intervention had averted a potential nuclear confrontation. However, he
downplayed the risk of nuclear exchange, describing it as "remote"
and noting that there remains a “significant gap” between conventional military
operations and the nuclear threshold.
The top Indian
military official stressed the importance of learning from the incident. “The
analysis of what went wrong and why the jets were lost was critical,” Chauhan
said, adding that corrective measures were swiftly implemented. Flight
operations resumed just two days later, with India reportedly conducting
"precise" strikes on Pakistani air bases located up to 300 kilometers
across the border.
Chauhan also pushed
back against Pakistan’s claims of successfully using foreign-supplied weaponry,
particularly from China, during the skirmish. He dismissed those assertions,
suggesting they were exaggerated.
Both India and
Pakistan have since dispatched diplomatic delegations to key world capitals,
aiming to shape global perceptions of the conflict and secure international
support.
The
clash between the two nuclear-armed neighbors sparked global concern, but
cooler heads appear to have prevailed. Still, the incident underscores the
fragile nature of peace in South Asia and the risks posed by even limited
military engagements between long-time adversaries.
No comments:
Post a Comment