Paul Ehrlich, born in Prussia
in 1854, was a German medical scientist who conducted pioneering work in
hematology, immunology, and chemotherapy, and discovered the first effective
drug treatment for syphilis. Introduced to the staining of cells by his cousin
Carl Weigert, a renowned neuropathologist, this interest—perhaps even
obsession—persisted and influenced Ehrlich’s conceptual thinking for much of
his scientific career. During his medical school days, while continuing to
experiment with chemical dyes, Ehrlich observed that some cells and tissues
selectively took up and bound chemical dyes and were stained, yet others did
not. After completing medical school, he developed a dye that permitted the
differentiation of the numerous blood cells, and this served as the basis for
the study of hematology.
In 1893, while working on an
antiserum for the treatment of diphtheria, Ehrlich began formulating his
side-chain theory, which described how antibodies—proteins produced by the
immune system— are formed, and how they interact with foreign substances
(antigens). Based on an analogy of a lock and key, he postulated that the
surface of each cell contains distinct receptors or “side chains” that
specifically bind to disease-causing toxins produced by the infectious agent.
The binding of the toxin to the side chain (key-to-lock) is an irreversible
interaction, and prevents any additional binding of toxin molecules.
The body responds by
producing an excess number of side chains (antibodies), but the cell lacks the
capacity to accommodate all the side chains on its cell surface. The excess
side chains are released, where they remain in circulation, prepared to protect
the individual against subsequent attacks by the disease-causing toxins.
Ehrlich’s first paper describing his side-chain theory appeared in 1897. The
theory was publically presented at a Royal Society meeting in London in 1900,
where it was enthusiastically received, and for which he was a co-recipient of
the 1908 Nobel Prize. By 1915, the year of Ehrlich’s death, exceptions to his
theory were identified, and many details were found to be incorrect. The theory
fell into disfavor, but his concepts on antigens and antibodies serve as the
basis for immunology.
No comments:
Post a Comment