Jan 19, 2016

William Harvey's Compassion: Challenging Witchcraft Accusations

In 1628, William Harvey defied established beliefs with his groundbreaking paper, "De motu cordis et sanguinis" (On the motion of the heart and blood), asserting that the heart pumped blood in a one-way closed system from arteries to veins. Harvey's theory, based on meticulous dissections and experiments across various species, hinged on the crucial observation that vein valves allowed blood to flow only toward the heart. Despite having compelling evidence since his 1615 Lumleian Lecture, Harvey hesitated to publicize his concept widely, as it challenged the deeply entrenched 1,400-year-old teachings of Galen, which posited that blood was produced in the liver, flowed between heart chambers through invisible pores, and nourished the body's organs. Harvey's calculations showed this to be mathematically impossible.

While Harvey enjoyed the support of Kings James I and Charles I as their court physician, his defiance of Galen's authority sparked two decades of controversy and opposition in Continental Europe. A missing piece in Harvey's explanation was how blood transitioned from arteries to veins, a gap later filled by Marcello Malpighi's confirmation of capillaries in 1661.

"De motu cordis" now stands as the cornerstone of our understanding of the cardiovascular system, a pivotal publication in the history of biology and medicine. Harvey, hailed as the father of modern physiology, revolutionized science by combining rigorous experimentation and quantification with simple observation.


While practicing medicine, William Harvey, depicted in this engraving, examined four women who faced accusations of witchcraft. Despite the societal expectations to find incriminating bodily marks, he gave testimony that ultimately cleared their names.


No comments:

Post a Comment